DecisionDepot
California legal research
All judges

Heithecker

BUTTE · 2 rulings ingested

Ruling distribution
2
rulings
Granted0%
Denied0%
Continued0%
Other100%
Prevailing party
2
determined
Plaintiff0%
Defendant50%
Mixed50%
At a glance
Grant rate0%
Denial rate0%
Continuance rate0%
First seenJun 24, 2026
Most recentJul 1, 2026

Motion type breakdown

Motion to Quash
1
Motion to Compel Further Responses
1
Motion for Sanctions
1
Demurrer
1
Granted
Denied
Continued
Other

Recent rulings

CaseCountyMotionRulingIndexedHearing
25CV03075
June Howard, by and through her attorney in fact, Genevieve Bauguess v. AOCL, LLC et al.
butte
Civil
Defendants Sequoia Healthcare Group, LLC, Aspen Skilled Healthcare, Inc., and Aspen Healthcare Services LLC’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s First Amended ComplaintSUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMENDAug 20, 2026Jul 1, 2026
25CV03075
June Howard, by and through her attorney in fact, Genevieve Bauguess v. AOCL, LLC et al.
butte
Civil
Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena; Defendant AOCL, LLC’s Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories; Defendant AOCL, LLC’s Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Production of Documents; Defendant AOCL LLC’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form InterrogatoriesPlaintiff's motion to quash is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant's discovery motions are largely granted; requests for monetary sanctions are denied.Aug 3, 2026Jun 24, 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is Judge Heithecker's grant rate in California Superior Court?+

Based on 2 tentative rulings indexed by DecisionDepot, Judge Heithecker has a 0% grant rate (0% denial rate, 0% continued). Counties active: BUTTE.

What kinds of motions does Judge Heithecker hear most often?+

The most common motion type in Judge Heithecker's indexed rulings is Motion to Quash. The full motion-type breakdown appears on this page — each motion type shows grant, denial, and continuance counts so practitioners can prepare accordingly.