Order to Show Cause re: Appointment of Referee
1281.2, subdivision (c), that subdivision cannot be applied to deny the enforcement of the arbitration clauses governed by the FAA. [Citation.]”.)
Accordingly, the Court STAYS the action only as to Defendant, Lyft, Inc. pending completion of arbitration. 9 U.S.C.A. § 3.
An ADR Review Hearing is set for December 10, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. in Dept. C34.
Defendant Lyft to give notice.
4. 30-2025-01453654 1. Case Management Conference 2. Order to Show Cause re: Appointment of Referee 400 Spectrum Holdings LLC vs. McSen Realty All parties should be ready to discuss appointment of a discovery referee and apportionment Corp. of the costs.
5. 30-2025-01492538 1. Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories 2. Motion to Compel Production Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP cs. Enerra The Motion to Compel Supplemental Responses to Requests for Production and Special Corporation Interrogatories brought by the Plaintiff Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP against Defendant Enerra Corporation is GRANTED.
As a preliminary matter, both parties agree that this motion may be heard notwithstanding the stay pending arbitration entered on November 6, 2025. (ROA 95.)
Code of Civil Procedure § 485.230 provides:
Where a right to attach order has been issued by the court, a plaintiff may discover, through any means provided for by, and subject to the protections included in, Title 4 (commencing with Section 2016.010) of Part 4, the identity, location, and value of property in which the defendant has an interest.
On September 2, 2025, this Court issued a right to attach order in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $108,277.50. (ROA 86.) On that same date, the Court also enjoined Defendant from spending, transferring, encumbering, hypothecating or otherwise diminishing the value-- other than payment to Stradling-- of any and all monies received by Enerra Corporation or its affiliates: (a) in connection with Chubb/Federal Insurance Company Policy No. 8261-9093, (b) from "the Conti Parties' insurance company" pursuant to the settlement agreement dated February 6, 2025; or (c) in connection with any other insurance payments related to Enerra Corp. v. Conti Group LLC, et al., No. 3:23-cv-00194-L until the completion of arbitration relating to the fee dispute between these parties (that is, the dispute herein and any dispute relating to the alleged contingency agreement). (Ibid.)
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Plaintiff now seeks further responses to special interrogatories Nos. 1-3 as well as the production of additional documents responsive to requests for production Nos. 1 and 2, for the purpose of learning the identity, location and value of the property in which Defendant has an interest.
In opposition, Defendant submits the declaration of its President, Sergio Perez, who declares that “the funds received by Enerra from Chubb/Federal Insurance and from the Conti partes’