DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025-01516569·orange·Civil·Civil Contract
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Lanagan vs. Penney OPCO LLC

Demurrer to Complaint

Hearing date
Jun 5, 2026
Department
C13
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 11, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffT.K.C Lanagan
DefendantPenney OpCo, LLC

Ruling

(J) Policies and procedures related to the repurchase or replacement of a vehicle under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, which were in effect during plaintiff’s ownership of the subject vehicle, are relevant.

(K) The parties should schedule the deposition for a mutually agreeable date within 30 days of the court-ordered meet and confer conference. If the parties are unable to agree on a date, the court will set the deposition for a date within a week of the continued hearing on this motion.

Plaintiff shall give notice of all of the above.

8 Lanagan vs. Penney OPCO LLC

2025-01516569 Demurrer to Complaint

Defendant Penney OpCo, LLC’s Demurrer to the Complaint is CONTINUED to September 11, 2026 at 9:30 AM.

Plaintiff T.K.C Lanagan appears to have served an opposition to the demurrer on Defendant, but failed to file it with the court.

Accordingly, the hearing is continued, and Plaintiff is ordered to file his opposition with the court within the next 15 days. No further briefing is allowed.

Moving Party shall give notice.

9 Thomas Solar Energy vs. Orange County Sanitation District

2023-01337224 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

The motion of attorney Matt Cortez of Matt Cortez Law, PC to withdraw as attorney of record for Plaintiffs Thomas Solar Energy and Thomas Ngueyn is GRANTED only as to Plaintiff Thomas Solar Energy, effective as of

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share