DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
RG21108692·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing 2 months agoCase reassigned for jury trial to Dept 25; trial reset to 2026-06-15.

Andrews v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jun 11, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 15, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAndrews
DefendantCyprus Amax Minerals Company

Ruling

RG21108692: Andrews VS Cyprus Amax Minerals Company 06/11/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 06/09/2026 Patrick McKinney

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case.

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that by direction of the Presiding Judge, the above matter has been reassigned for JURY TRIAL to the Hon. Jenna M. Whitman, Department 25, located at the Administration Building, 1225 Oak Street, Oakland, CA 94612. This matter remains assigned to Department 18 for case management.

The Jury Trial scheduled for 06/15/2026 is reset to 06/15/2026 at 08:45 AM in Department 25 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

Remote appearances are authorized on June 15, 2026.

Designated Defense Counsel (Defendant) must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: If the parties do not contest the Tentative Case Management Order, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative case management order must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share