Daniel Rasul, Jr. vs Zohaib Valani et al
Quash Subpoena
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240
DATE: June 5, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)
LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 4 25CV464886 ROSEMARY CEJA vs NEXSENTIO et Motion: Leave to File al On December 10, 2025, the Court sustained a demurrer to all causes of action in the original complaint with 10 days leave to amend. The 10th day fell on Saturday, December 20, 2025. The immediately following Monday, December 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed this motion. Plaintiff’s unopposed motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiff shall serve and file the First Amended Complaint within 5 days of the date of the hearing on this motion.
Plaintiff shall prepare and submit the final order after hearing, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 10 days of the date of the hearing. LINE 5 25CV470186 Daniel Rasul, Jr. vs Zohaib Valani et al Motion: Quash Subpoena
OFF CALENDAR. LINE 6 26CV484320 Capital One, N.A. vs Kathie Wright Hearing: Petition Compel Arbitration
Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 6 for tentative ruling.
- oo0oo -
3
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”