DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV457102·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED. Defendant shall serve and file the First Amended Verified Answer to Complaint within 5 days of the date of the hearing.

Michael Sinyard vs Brian Ledig

Leave to Amend

Hearing date
Jun 5, 2026
Department
13
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMichael Sinyard
DefendantBrian Ledig

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240

DATE: June 5, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 25CV456698 James Choi vs WESTFIELD, LLC, a Motion: Compel Delaware Limited Liability Company et al Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 1 for tentative ruling. LINE 2 25CV457102 Michael Sinyard vs Brian Ledig Motion: Leave to Amend

Defendant’s unopposed motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall serve and file the First Amended Verified Answer to Complaint within 5 days of the date of the hearing on this motion.

The Court will prepare the final order. LINE 3 25CV463523 RAVI VOU vs COUNTY OF SANTA Hearing: Demurrer CLARA Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 3 for tentative ruling.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share