Request for Order (RFO) seeking child support
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 June 11, 2026 8:30 AM/1:30 PM
3. DEREK BYRNE V. CHRISTINA BYRNE 22FL0036
On March 10, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order seeking child support orders. He filed his Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. All required documents were served on March 27, 2026.
The Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) filed its Responsive Declaration to Request for Order on April 1st. It was served on March 30th.
Petitioner filed and served his updated Income and Expense Declaration on May 21. st
Respondent filed her Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and her Income and Expense Declaration on May 27th however there is no Proof of Service for either document therefore the court cannot consider them.
Because DCSS is providing child support enforcement services in this matter, the issue of child support is continued to the DCSS calendar in Department 10 on Monday, August 10th at 8:30 AM to be heard by the child support commissioner in accordance with Family Code § 4251.
TENTATIVE RULING #3: BECAUSE DCSS IS PROVIDING CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES IN THIS MATTER, THE ISSUE OF CHILD SUPPORT IS CONTINUED TO THE DCSS CALENDAR IN DEPARTMENT 10 ON MONDAY AUGUST 10TH AT 8:30 AM TO BE HEARD BY THE CHILD SUPPORT COMMISSIONER IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAMILY CODE § 4251.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”