STEFAN E. ADLER v. JENNIFER ROSEDAIL

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 STEFAN E. ADLER,) Case Number: FDI-25-801492) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 11, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JENNIFER ROSEDAIL,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SEEK WORK AND VOCATIONAL EVALUATION 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties are Petitioner Stefan E.

Adler (Father) and Respondent Jennifer Rosedail (Mother). 18 They share two minor children (twins): Hugo Adler (DOB: 7/4/13) and Mose Adler (DOB: 19 7/4/13). 20 2) On 4/17/26, Mother filed a Request for Order asking the Court to order Father comply with a 21 Seek Work Order and undergo a vocational evaluation at Mother’s expense. Mother asserts that 22 Father has 22 years of work experience as senior paralegal at “at well-established ‘white shoe’ 23 law firms and a big five consulting firm” and landlord managing and repairing the parties’ rental 24 properties.

Mother states Father left his former employer between 2009 and 2010 without an 25 agreement from Mother to support him indefinitely. Mother believes it is in the children’s best 26 interest to earn an income to support them. Mother attached a proposed Seek Work Order to her 27 Request for Order. 28 3) On 5/29/26, Father field a Responsive Declaration to Mother’s Request for Order. It is Father’s 29 position that since 2010 he has not received a salary because he was the primary parent and acting

1 as the property manager for the parties’ numerous rental properties. Father states he previously 2 agreed to submitting to a vocational evaluation and does not believe Mother’s motion is necessary 3 as he already met with a vocational evaluator – Ms. Trustin – and is actively engaged in working 4 with her. It is Father’s position that the Seek Work Order is premature without the vocational 5 evaluation being completed. Father asks the Court to continue the matter after the 7/24/26 6 Mandatory Settlement Conference. 7 4) On 6/4/26, Mother filed a Reply Declaration reiterating Father’s duty to support his children. 8 Mother asserts that Father does not provide any care to the parties’ adult child, Elvis, who is 9 permanently disabled and requires a high level of care.

Mother disputes that Father is the primary 10 parent of the twins. 11 B. Findings and Order 12 1) Family Code section 3900 proscribes the duty of both parents to support their minor children. 13 Further, Family Code section 4053 sets forth the principle that this duty is a parent’s “first and 14 principal obligation.” 15 2) As such, the Court finds good cause to adopt Mother’s proposed Seek Work Order, which is 16 attached hereto and incorporate herein, effective 7/1/26. 17 3) Counsel for Mother shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing, which shall include as an 18 attachment Mother’s proposed Seek Work Order. 19 4) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within 20 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 21 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 22 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the 23 proposed order after hearing directly to the court.

Failure to submit the order after hearing within 24 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 25 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 26

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address): For court use only

Kelly J. Robbins/Matthew J. Huelsenbeck 154297/353093 Robbins Family Law 388 Market Street, Suite 920 San Francisco, CA 94111 TELEPHONE No.: (415) 788-5400 Fax no.: (415) 788-5455 E-MAIL ADDRESS: kelly @robbinsfamilylaw.com ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Respondent, Jennifer Rosdail Superior Court of California County of San Francisco 400 McAllister Street San Francisco, CA 94102

Petitioner/Plaintiff: Stefan E. Adler Respondent/Defendant: Jennifer Rosdail Other Parent:

CASE NUMBER: WORK SEARCH ORDER FDI-25-801492

1. [X] Petitioner L_} Respondent [_} Other Parent is ordered to look for work, and to: CX} spend a minimum of 20 hours per week in job search related activities. CX} apply for a minimum of 15 jobs per week. LJ No more than applications can be done online.

[J Other conditions:

You are responsible for maintaining (1) a written log of your weekly activities (see local form: weekly search log) and (2) copies of all paperwork/correspondence related to your job search (letters, job applications sent, responses, contact information / business cards, etc.)

Activities should include most or all of the following: A. Networking with personal and professional contacts B Interviewing for information, advice and job leads (“informational interviewing”)

C. Reviewing prior contacts and following up regularly D. Conducting computer research (company, industry, job/current openings) Examples include: e Company-specific websites

e Google searches for relevant industry information @ Wwww.monster.com / www.craiagslist.org

Searching local newspaper job ads for relevant openings

Responding to and following up on advertised job openings (online, in-person, newspaper)

Local Court Form WORK SEARCH ORDER Page 1 UFC - 8/1/14

CEB | forms Rosdail, Jennifer

G. Job search-related communication (resume revision, cover letters, following up on job leads, e-mail communications, thank-you notes, etc.)

H. Contacting/working with placement agencies Contacting/attending alumni groups Attending career counseling / job coaching sessions ASL

Participating in job search clubs and/or job search skills training

Participating in professional organizations OZzZr

Job skills training (computer/vocational classes relevant to job objective) Preparing for and attending job interviews Contacting a union, obtain placement on list, attend roll calls, and track placement on list.

2. You must serve a copy of the logs once per month and within the first 10 days of each month, starting May 8, 2026, to: [X}J_ Opposing counsel or party [_} Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) 617 Mission Street, San Francisco, CA 94102

=

3. You must bring the signed, original weekly logs and all paperwork/correspondence related to your job search to court with you. Copies of all paperwork/correspondence related to your job search must be available for review if requested by opposing party within 10 days of request.

4. If you find work before the next court date, you must notify opposing party and counsel (if any) and (if checked)(_J the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), in writing within ten days, providing name, address, and telephone number of employer, salary or wage level, job title, copies of any employment contract, hiring letter, or employment agreement, and first month's paycheck stub upon receipt.

5. The court reserves jurisdiction to retroactively modify support to the earliest date permitted by law, and to impose sanctions for any failure to comply with this order, including imputing income.

{<3 SPOUSAL SUPPORT: It is the goal of this state that each party will make reasonable good faith efforts to become self-supporting as provided in Family Code §4320. The failure to make reasonable good faith efforts may be one of the factors considered by the court as a basis for modifying or terminating spousal or partner support.

[_} The parties are ordered to return to court for review on, at in Dept.

Date: Judge/Commissioner

Local Court Form WORK SEARCH ORDER Page 2 UFC — 8/1/14

CEB | forms Rosdail, Jennifer