DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-CLJ-04809·sanmateo·Civil·Civil Discovery
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA VS BRIAN CLIFFORD

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion for an Order Deeming the Truth of the Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admission as Admitted

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, NA
DefendantBRIAN CLIFFORD

Attorneys

DAVID BARTLEYfor Plaintiff
CHARLES J. SMITHfor Defendant

Ruling

6/04/26 - Law and Motion Calendar Judge Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 10 of 18

2:00 PM LINE: 5 25-CLJ-04809 WELLS FARGO BANK, NA VS BRIAN CLIFFORD

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA DAVID BARTLEY BRIAN CLIFFORD CHARLES J. SMITH

PLAINTIFF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION AS ADMITTED

TENTATIVE RULING:

The unopposed motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of proof that defendant was given proper notice of the hearing date. The motion was filed on December 2, 2025. The POS indicates it was served on December 1, 2025. However, the hearing date was changed from May 21, 2026 to June 4, 2026 at the time of filing. Because the motion was served before filing, it does not appear that the amended version of the notice was the one served on defendant. To date, the court’s record does not reflect the filing or service of an amended notice of hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share