DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23-CIV-00283·sanmateo·Civil·Discovery Sanctions
Hearing 3 months agoMOOT

ROBERT M. LINDBLAD VS. VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL

Plaintiff Robert Lindblad’s hearings for sanctions to discovery rules under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
2
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT M. LINDBLAD
DefendantVALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY

Attorneys

PRO SEfor Plaintiff
STEVEN N. GEISEfor Defendant

Ruling

6/04/26 - Law and Motion Calendar Judge Mark A. McCannon – Department 2 Page 5 of 18

2:00 PM LINE: 2 23-CIV-00283 ROBERT M. LINDBLAD VS. VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY, ET AL

ROBERT M. LINDBLAD PRO SE VALERO MARKETING AND SUPPLY COMPANY STEVEN N. GEISE

PLAINTIFF ROBERT LINDBALD’S HEARINGS FOR SANCTIONS TO DISCOVERY RULES UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

TENTATIVE RULING:

This matter is moot. Plaintiff seeks to continue the hearing on defendant’s motion for sanctions. However, the court heard and granted defendant’s motion for sanctions, in part, on December 11, 2025.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share