DCSS V. DAVID HARTSOCK III

15. DCSS V. DAVID HARTSOCK III (OTHER PARENT: SYNDALEE VILLAFUERTE)

Other Parent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on December 22, 2025, seeking a modification of child custody orders. The parties were referred to Child Custody Recommending Counseling (CCRC) with an appointment on January 21, 2026, and a review hearing on March 19, 2026. Proof of Service shows Respondent was served with only the FL-300 and RA-010 and 0202. There is no Proof of Service showing Petitioner was properly served.

Only Other Parent appeared at the CCRC appointment. As such a single parent report was filed with the court on March 3, 2026. Copies were mailed to the parties on March 4th.

There have been no Responsive Declarations filed by either Petitioner or Respondent.

The court drops the matter from calendar for failure to properly served Petitioner and Respondent.

All prior orders remain in full force and effect.

TENTATIVE RULING #15: THE MATTER IS DROPPED FROM CALENDAR DUE TO THE FAILURE TO PROPERLY SERVE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT. ALL PRIOR ORDERS REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.