DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO2301796·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

IN THE MATTER OF FARZAD SARABI, ESTATE OF

Fourth Report of Status of Administration and Petition for Extension of Time to Administer the Estate

Hearing date
Jun 4, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Feb 4, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMani Mir
PetitionerRon Varasteh

Ruling

PRO2301796 IN THE MATTER OF FARZAD SARABI, ESTATE OF

Fourth Report of Status of Administration and Petition for Extension of Time to Administer the Estate, filed by Mani Mir and Ron Varasteh on 5/4/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, the Fourth Report of Status of Administration is accepted and approved. Personal Representative is ordered to comply with the following future dates: 1. Status on Closing Estate. a. Either: (1) a Petition for Final Distribution; or (2) a Fifth Report of Status of Administration shall be filed by January 14, 2027, as required by Probate Code sections 12200-12201. b. A status hearing re filing the Petition or Report shall be set on February 4, 2027, at 10:00 a.m. i. If neither document has been timely filed, an appearance will be required.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 9 | 14

ii. If the Petition or Report is timely filed, the hearing will be set on February 4, 2027, at 9:00 a.m.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 10 | 14

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share