Motion to Quash Service of Summons
The Court Orders Plaintiff to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.
7 30-2026-01564845 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Motion to Quash BRE-FMCA, LLC Service of Summons (ROA 25) and Plaintiff’s Opposition (ROA 28). vs. Rios The Court takes Judicial Notice of the Proof of Service of Summons (ROA 10).
A registered process server who made multiple attempts at personal service may proceed with substituted service under Code of Civil Procedure § 415.20. Here, the registered process server, George Craig (#2019267578), signed under penalty of perjury that he made multiple attempts to serve the defendant personally before proceeding with substituted service. On the third attempt to serve, the registered process server provided the documents to a woman at the premises, who answered the door, provided a physical description, took the paperwork, and refused to provide the registered process server with her name.
There is no indication that “Jane Doe” was not an occupant of the household or refused to accept the documents. Case law such as Zirbes v. Stratton (1986) 187 Cal. App. 3d 1407, 1416-1417 allows for substituted service, which is reasonably calculated to give notice – the circumstances here are reasonable that it would give notice to the Defendant.
The Court DENIES the Motion to Quash Service of Summons.
Defendant is ordered to file a responsive pleading within 5 calendar days.
Plaintiff is ordered to serve notice of the Court’s ruling.
8 30-2026-01567293 The Court has read and considered the Defendant’s Motion to Strike (ROA Nguyen vs. Rios 15) and the Complaint (ROA 2).
The Court DENIES the Motion to Strike.
The Court orders the Defendants to file an Answer within 5 business days.
The Plaintiff is ordered to provide notice of the Court’s ruling.
9 30-2026-01569587 The Court has read and considered the Defendants’ Motion to Quash Bridge WF Ca Service of Summons (ROA 13 & 18). Crystal View LP vs. Vickers The Court takes Judicial Notice of the Proof of Service of Summons (ROA 8 & 10).
California Evidence Code Section 647 creates a rebuttable presumption that a proof of service signed by a registered process server is true. It shifts the burden of proving lack of service to the defendant, rather than requiring the plaintiff to prove proper service. Here, registered process server Justin Martin (2655) declared under penalty of perjury that he personally served Ms. Vickers on Thursday, May 14, 2026, at 8:39 PM (ROA 10) and Ms. Sims on Saturday, May 16, 2026, at 1:51 PM (ROA 8). Defendants have
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”