Sanctions
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 05/27/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 21CV389381 Dee Sheslter MOTION: LEAVE TO FILE v. Shelly Koning Please control click or scroll down to Line 1 LINE 2 23CV413944 Xiufeng Xie MOTION: SANCTIONS v. Doe, et al - Defendant/Cross-Complainant’s Motion for Sanctions Doe v. Xiufeng Xie Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5 authorizes sanctions for actions or tactics undertaken in bad faith that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay. Defendant/Cross-Complainant has not made the requisite showing to warrant the imposition of sanctions under the statute.
Although the Court finds that Defendant/Cross-Complainant has now made a sufficient showing supporting protections pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 367.3, the Court does not find that Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant knowingly violated those protections or otherwise acted in a manner warranting sanctions.
Accordingly, the motion for sanctions is DENIED.
Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant shall prepare and submit the final proposed order, together with the required EFS-020 forms, within 7 days of the hearing date. LINE 3 24CV430700 Metropolis System MOTION TO INTERVENE & STAY DISCOVERY LLC v. Cryptic Labs LLC Please control click or scroll down to Line 3
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”