DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26-65666·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 4 months agoCONTINUED

Conservatorship of Florence Barnes

Review hearing

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 23, 2028

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherFlorence Barnes

Ruling

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Conservatorship of Karen Lee 24PR000278

[1] REVIEW HEARING

[2] FIRST ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF CONSERVATOR; PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF FEES TO CONSERVATOR OF PERSON AND ESTATE AND ATTORNEY FOR CONSERVATOR

TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed. After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial and for an Accounting in two years on March 07, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. All accounting documents must be filed at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

Conservatorship of Florence Barnes 26-65666

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds that the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on May 23, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

**at 9:00 a.m.** Conservatorship of Katherine Roxanne Wright PR24886

REVIEW HEARING

APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share