Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Propounded to Defendant Piercey and Associates LTD; Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Special Interrogatories Propounded to Defendant Rodney Piercey; Amended Motion to Compel Initial Responses from Defendant Rodney Piercey and for Monetary Sanctions; Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Propounded on Piercey and Associates; Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Form Interrogatory 15.1 from Defendants Rodney Piercey, Piercey & Associates, and Kenneth Piercey; Defendant Rodney Piercey’s Motion for Relief from Waiver of Objections to Plaintiff’s Request for Production, Set One
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Judge Benson – Law & Motion – Wednesday, June 10, 2026 @ 9:00 AM
** FOR THIS HEARING ONLY: IF YOU ARE REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT PLEASE CALL 530-532-7125**
1. 21CV02860 Debt Management Partners, LLC v. Fuentes, Teresea
EVENT: Opposition to Claim of Exemption
The Court will conduct a hearing.
2-7. 23CV00528 Rosinski, Melinda et al. v. Piercey, Matthew et al.
EVENT: (1) Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Propounded to Defendant Piercey and Associates LTD (Continued from 4/29/26 and 5/20/26) (2) Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Special Interrogatories Propounded to Defendant Rodney Piercey (Continued from 4/29/26 and 5/20/26) (3) Amended Motion to Compel Initial Responses from Defendant Rodney Piercey and for Monetary Sanctions (Continued from 4/29/26 and 5/20/26) (4) Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents Propounded on Piercey and Associates (Continued from 4/29/26 and 5/20/26) (5) Amended Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Form Interrogatory 15.1 from Defendants Rodney Piercey, Piercey & Associates, and Kenneth Piercey (Continued from 4/29/26 and 5/20/26) (6) Defendant Rodney Piercey’s Motion for Relief from Waiver of Objections to Plaintiff’s Request for Production, Set One (Continued from 6/3/26)
After considering the proposed candidates submitted by counsel, the Court selects Douglas Robbins to serve as discovery referee. The referee is appointed referee for all purposes concerning discovery disputes between the parties. The referee shall have the authority to set the date, time, and place for all hearings determined by the referee to be necessary; to direct the issuance of subpoenas; to preside over hearings; to take evidence; and to rule on objections, motions, and other requests made during the course of the hearings, all with the same authority as if the 1
Court were to preside thereat (except for the power of contempt which is specifically reserved to the Court). The referee shall submit a written report to the parties and to the Court within twenty (20) days after the completion of the hearing, containing a proposed order and proposed sanctions if deemed appropriate. Any objections to the report shall be filed with the Court no later than ten (10) calendar days after the date of mailing the report to counsel, which objections shall notice a hearing; copies of the objections and responses thereto shall be served upon the special referee.
The fees for the referee and for any Certified Shorthand Reporter shall be paid equally by the parties within ten (10) days of billing, according to their customary fee. However, the discovery referee may recommend that one or more of the parties pay more than an equal share of fees. The Court reserves jurisdiction to make such other and further orders with respect to the special referee as may be just and proper. Plaintiff shall prepare and submit a form of order consistent with this ruling within 2 weeks.
8-9. 23CV01923 Greenberg, Stuart et al. v. Jacques, Michael et al.
EVENT: (1) Defendant William Jacques’ Demurrer to Second Amended Complaint (2) Defendant Michael Jacques and Alpha Omega Investment Services, LLC’s Motion to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents
Defendant Michael Jacques and Alpha Omega Investment Services, LLC’s Motion to Compel Further Responses and Production of Documents This discovery motion, along with all other pending and future discovery disputes, is referred to the discovery referee. At the previous hearing counsel indicated a stipulation to select Douglas Jacobs as referee was forthcoming. The Court will hear from counsel re: status.
2|Page
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”