Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Demurrer; Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Motion to Strike
2025CUPA051807: MARIA YBARRA, INDIVIDUAL vs SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY, et al. 06/05/2026 in Department 43 Demurrer
The morning calendar in courtroom 43 will normally begin at 8:45. Please arrive for your hearing no later than 8:30 a.m. The door will be opened before the calendar is called.
The Court allows appearances by CourtCall and Zoom. Refer to the Courtroom 43 webpage for more information about remote appearances. If appearing by CourtCall, call in no later than 8:30 a.m. If you wish to appear by CourtCall, you must make arrangements with CourtCall by 4:00 p.m. the court day before your scheduled hearing. Requests for approval of a CourtCall appearance made on the morning of the hearing will not be granted. No exceptions will be made.
For Zoom appearances, all counsel appearing by Zoom must email the court at Courtroom43@ventura.courts.ca.gov with a simultaneous copy to all other counsel/selfrepresented parties no later than 3:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing. INCLUDE THE PHRASE "ZOOM APPEARANCE ON (DATE OF HEARING)" IN THE SUBJECT LINE OF YOUR EMAIL. The email must identify the person who will make the appearance. You will receive the login information for your appearance in reply to your email. If appearing by Zoom, log into the hearing no later than 8:30 a.m. The Court will transfer you to the meeting room when your matter is called. Additional instructions can be found on the Courtroom 43 webpage. When you log in to Zoom, be sure that your name and the case name are used as your Zoom name. IF YOU DO NOT FOLLOW ALL OF THESE INSTRUCTIONS, YOU WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO APPEAR BY ZOOM AT THE HEARING.
With respect to the tentative ruling below, no notice of intent to appear is required. If you wish to submit on the tentative ruling you can fax notice to Judge Coats's secretary, Ms. Brantner at 805- 477-8790, stating that you submit on the tentative. Or you may email Courtroom43@ventura.courts.ca.gov with all counsel copied on the email. Do not call in lieu of sending a fax or email. If you submit on the tentative without appearing and the opposing party appears, the hearing will be conducted in your absence. If you are the moving party and do not advise the Court that you submit on the tentative, or you do not appear at the hearing, the Court may deny your motion irrespective of the tentative.
Unless stated otherwise at the hearing, if a formal order is required but not signed at the hearing, the prevailing party shall prepare a proposed order and comply with CRC 3.1312 subdivisions (a), (b), (d) and (e). The signed order shall be served on all parties and a proof of service filed with the court. A "notice of ruling" in lieu of this procedure is not authorized.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Motions:
1. Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authoritys Demurrer 2. Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authoritys Motion to Strike
2025CUPA051807: MARIA YBARRA, INDIVIDUAL vs SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY, et al.
Tentative Rulings:
1. Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authoritys unopposed Demurrer is SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the first cause of action. The first cause of action does not plead the specific statutory basis for liability with particularity and does not affirmatively allege facts showing the claim falls outside applicable statutory immunities. The first cause of action also does not allege a specific legal duty, a breach of that duty, or causation as to Metro specifically as a government entity.
Under Government Code section 815, public entities in California enjoy broad sovereign immunity, and liability must be affirmatively and specifically created by statute. Complaints against public entities must plead the specific statutory basis for liability with particularity and must affirmatively allege facts showing the claim falls outside applicable statutory immunities.
The first cause of action is directed broadly against all defendants without distinguishing Metros role or legal status as a public entity from the private defendants named in the suit. The operative negligence allegations are substantially generic and do not identify the specific statutory authority that creates Metros duty of care, nor do they allege with any particularity how Metro specifically breached a cognizable legal duty. (Complaint ¶¶ 41-55.) The complaints general jurisdiction section references Government Code sections including sections 815.2(a) and 820(a) but are not tied to specific factual allegations about Metros employees or their conduct.
A negligence claim requires a plaintiff to allege a specific legal duty, a breach of that duty, and causation. The first cause of action lumps Metro together with private operators, and trucking companies without identifying what particular duty Metro owed as a public transit authority, whether that duty arises from its role as a train operator, a property owner, an employer, or some other capacity, and precisely how Metros conduct or omissions fell below the applicable standard or how the apply to a government entity. For these reasons, the demurrer to the First Cause of Action is sustained.
The Demurrer to the Complaint in its Entirety, expressed on page 3 of the moving papers, is not identified in the notice of demurrer, which states the demurrer only challenges the first cause of action. Furthermore, the points and authorities do not directly address a demurrer to the entire complaint. To the extent that such demurrer is sought, the Demurrer to the Complaint in its Entirety is OVERRULED for the foregoing reasons.
2. Defendant Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authoritys unopposed Motion to Strike is GRANTED. Under Govt. Code § 818, a public entity is not liable for damages awarded under section 3294 of the Civil Code or
2025CUPA051807: MARIA YBARRA, INDIVIDUAL vs SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY, et al.
other damages imposed primarily for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant. The prayer for punitive damages (complaint p.22, line 12) is stricken from the Complaint.
Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies of the first cause of action on or before June 26, 2026.
Moving party is ordered to serve notice of the Courts ruling.
3