Motion to Substitute Plaintiff
HTENTATIVE RULINGS
DEPARTMENT N17
Judge Craig L. Griffin
Date: June 1, 2026 Time: 2:00 PM
If you are submitting to the tentative, please call the Clerk at (657) 622-5617.
Appearances may be IN PERSON or through ZOOM. If appearing by ZOOM, go to https://www.occourts.org/media-relations/civil.html and click on the yellow box that reads: “CLICK HERE TO APPEAR FOR THE ONLINE CHECK-IN/ZOOM PILOT PROGRAM.” Call the department with any questions.
COURT REPORTERS: Official Court Reporters (i.e. Court Reporters employed by the Court) are NOT typically provided for law and motion matters in this department. If a party desires a record of a law and motion proceeding, it will be the party’s responsibility to provide a court reporter. Parties must comply with the Court’s policy on the use of privately retained court reporters which can be found at:
• Civil Court Reporter Pooling; and
• For additional information, please see the Court’s website at Court Reporter Interpreter Services for additional information regarding the availability of Court Reporters.
PUBLIC ACCESS: The public may attend the ZOOM session by telephone. Call the department for a call-in number.
# 1 Quach v. The unopposed Motion to Substitute Ty Quach In Place Of Deceased Wright et al Plaintiff, John Quach, filed on 4/24/26, is GRANTED.
The Motion and supporting declarations filed therewith demonstrate that Plaintiff John Quach (“Plaintiff”) died on 3/25/26, that Ty Quach is decedent’s adult son, that the decedent’s wife and other adult child agree that Ty Quach should substitute in for decedent here, and that Ty Quach has agreed to do so. The Motion also adequately complies with C.C.P. § 377.32. Ty Quach is therefore substituted into this action as Plaintiff, as successor in interest to decedent.
Counsel for Plaintiff to give notice. 2 Trejo v. Trejo Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by cross- complainants Maria Guadalupe Trejo (Maria), Juan Manuel Trejo (Juan) and Luis Angel Vasquez (Luis)(collectively, Cross- Complainants) on their first amended cross-complaint (FACC) against cross-defendant Carmen Trejo (Cross-Defendant). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.
Cross-Complainants’ request for judicial notice (RJN) is GRANTED.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
A plaintiff seeking summary judgment must produce admissible evidence sufficient to demonstrate that it is entitled to judgment as