DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV478689·santaclara·Civil·Appraisal
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Yingda Feng vs Xiaoyu Lin et al

Motion re: Appraisal

Hearing date
May 29, 2026
Department
13
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 1, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffYingda Feng
DefendantXiaoyu Lin

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13 Honorable Daniel T. Nishigaya R. Belligan, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408-882-2240

DATE: May 29, 2026 TIME: 9:00 & 9:01 A.M. TO CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING, YOU MUST CALL (408) 808-6856 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR TO THE HEARING. You must also inform all other sides to the issue before 4:00 P.M. the day prior to the hearing that you plan to contest the ruling. The Court will not hear argument, and the tentative ruling will be adopted if these notifications are not made. (Cal. Rule of Court 3.1308(a)(1); Civil Local Rule 8.D.)

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 4 24CV453677 American Express National Bank vs Motion for Entry of Judgment Rampradeep Dodda Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an order to enter judgment pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment is GRANTED. (Sexton v. Super Ct. (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410 [“[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the motion ... is meritorious.”].)

Plaintiff shall prepare and submit the final order and proposed judgment, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020 within 10 days of the date of the hearing. LINE 5 25CV477830 SHABNAM ANSARI vs FAIRCHILD Hearing: Demurrer IMAGING, INC. et al Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 5 for tentative ruling. LINE 6 25CV478535 SILVESTRE NAVARRETE vs FORD Hearing: Petition Compel Arbitration MOTOR COMPANY et al Ctrl Click (or scroll down) on Line 6 for tentative ruling. LINE 7 25CV478689 Yingda Feng vs Xiaoyu Lin et al Motion re: Appraisal

CONTINUED to July 1, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. by Stipulation and Order signed May 27, 2026.

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share