DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV137014·alameda·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

WOLFF, et al. vs ALL CITY TRUCKING, INC, et al.

Motion for Trial Preference

Hearing date
May 28, 2026
Department
24
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRobert Wolff
DefendantALL CITY TRUCKING, INC

Ruling

25CV137014: WOLFF, et al. vs ALL CITY TRUCKING, INC, et al. 05/28/2026 Hearing on Motion for Trial Preference filed by Robert Wolff (Incompetent Person) + CRS# 120541885203 in Department 24

Tentative Ruling - 05/27/2026 Rebekah Evenson

On Plaintiffs’ Motion for Trial Preference, PARTIES ARE TO APPEAR.

The Court is currently inclined to grant the motion, and to set the trial within 120 days of the date of this hearing (May 28).

Prior to the hearing, counsel shall meet and confer to discuss potential trial dates and availability.

PARTIES TO APPEAR

Department 24 is inviting you to a scheduled ZoomGov meeting

The Judicial Officer prefers all parties to be on camera, and for parties to log in using their full name (first and last). This can be tested before the hearing at https://zoom.us/test.

Join ZoomGov Meeting Https://www.zoomgov.com/my/department24?pwd=bWVtSER4blo0ODVrZVN3N0Fua2JmZz0 9

Meeting ID: 160 6661 8377

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share