Hinnenkamp – Probate
MOTION TO REQUEST HEARING ON CREDITOR’S CLAIM (ROA 186)
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
01317719 Hinnenkamp – TENTATIVE RULING Probate Case: Hinnenkamp – Probate 01317719
Calendar No.: 6
Date: 05/27/2026
MOTION TO REQUEST HEARING ON CREDITOR’S CLAIM (ROA 186)
June Estrada, in propria persona, filed a motion captioned as, “PLEADING TITLE: MOTION TO REQUEST A HEARING FOR CREDITOR’S CLAIM FOR JUNE ESTRADA EXPEDITE TO DEBORAH SUDERNO.” (ROA 186.) The motion is DENIED as procedurally defective.
Ms. Estrada submitted a creditor’s claim on 4/18/23. (ROA 5.) Deborah Suderno was appointed Administrator on 6/20/24, and Letters issued on 7/24/24. (ROAs 108 and 120.) Ms. Estrada’s claim was rejected by the Administrator on 6/3/25. (ROA 182.)
In her moving papers, Ms. Estrada acknowledges that she received the Notice of Rejection of her claim. (ROA 186, Mot., 4:12-13.)
Ms. Estrada’s remedy was to commence an action (i.e., a civil lawsuit) on the claim within 90 days of rejection. (Prob. Code § 9353) Filing a motion in the probate action to contest a rejection is not an available procedural remedy.
Ms. Suderno is ordered to give notice of this ruling.
01389717 Machorro – TENTATIVE RULING Trust Case: Machorro – Trust 01389717
Calendar No.: 9
Date: 05/27/2026 MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (ROA 231)
Petitioner Vanessa Stone (“Petitioner”) moves to compel initial responses to requests for production of documents
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”