DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
30-2022-01266610·orange·Probate·Trust
Hearing 3 months ago

De Leon – Trust

MOTION TO DISMISS

Hearing date
May 27, 2026
Department
CM08
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

Superior Court of the State of California County of Orange TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR DEPARTMENT CM08 Commissioner Sharon M. Anderson Temporary Judge Catherine Evans

Date: 05/27/2026 Court Room Rules and Notices

# Case Name Tentative 1 De Leon – Trust; 30-2022-01266610 MOTION TO DISMISS

2 Garcia – Trust; 30-2025-01471869 DEMURRER

Respondent Ulisses Gonzalez’ Demurrer (ROA 30) is OVERRULED.

Respondent Ulisses Gonzalez (Respondent) demurs to all causes of action in the petition filed by Jennifer Macy and Elaine G. Rodriguez (collectively Petitioners) on the ground each claim fails to state sufficient facts because the petition does not provide details regarding the alleged individual misconduct by Respondent but, rather, generally alleges misconduct by “RESPONDENTS”—a term defined in the petition as meaning Ulisses and his mother Martha Garcia, who is also a respondent. (Petition at 2:19-25.) The petition includes the following allegations of wrongdoing against the respondents:

(1) “[T]he purported TRUST was executed as a direct result of undue influence exerted by RESPONDENTS over DECEDENT.” (ROA 2 at 4:19- 21.) (2) “[T]he purported TRUST was to RESPONDENTS’ own benefit and to the detriment of DECEDENT’s children.” (ROA 2 at 4:21-23.) (3) “RESPONDENTS occupied the positions of supportive wife and step-son, respectively, to DECEDENT during his declining physical and mental health. DECEDENT reposed trust and confident in RESPONDENTS during a time of vulnerability, which RESPONDENTS used to influence DECEDENT to execute the TRUST in their favor.” (ROA 2 at 5:18-22.)’ (4) “RESPONDENTS actively procured the purported TRUST as part of a pattern of conduct aimed at gaining control of DECEDENT’s major assets, including real property, personal property,

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share