DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23-01352644·orange·Civil·Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record
Hearing 3 months agoDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Salinas vs. Bazoft Automotive

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
May 22, 2026
Department
C12
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSalinas
DefendantBazoft Automotive d/b/a South Coast Mitsubishi
DefendantNissan Extended Service Corporation, Inc.
DefendantSentry Select Insurance Company

Attorneys

Anthony Chavos(Chavos & Rau APLC)for Defendant
Laurie Rau(Chavos & Rau APLC)for Defendant

Ruling

2. Salinas vs. Bazoft Automotive

23-01352644

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

The motions by Anthony Chavos, Laurie Rau, Chavos & Rau APLC, to withdraw as counsel for defendants Bazoft Automotive d/b/a South Coast Mitsubishi, Nissan Extended Service Corporation, Inc., and Sentry Select Insurance Company, are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

The original hearings on the instant motions were continued on 3-19- 26, as moving counsel’s original declarations did not sufficiently state grounds for withdrawal, and the originally provided proposed orders were blank. (ROA 130 [3-19-26 minute order].) Moving counsel were ordered to file and serve any supplemental papers by 5-1-26, including supplemental declarations and “completed proposed orders.” (Id.) The supplemental papers were eventually filed and served on 5- 4-26.

Moving counsel’s supplemental declarations (ROA 136, 137, 139) now sufficiently state grounds for withdrawal. However, the new proposed orders (ROA 141, 142, 143) are still incomplete; ¶¶ 2, 3, 5, and 6 are still blank. In particular, ¶ 6 is necessary in order for the parties to have proper addresses for service on the clients in the future, if withdrawal is granted. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362, subds. (d), (e) [proposed order required].)

As moving counsel failed to timely and properly comply with the court’s prior order, the motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Clerk shall give notice.

3. Guzman-Leal vs. General Motors, LLC

23-01357484

Motion for Attorney Fees

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney fees is GRANTED.

Defendant General Motors, LLC shall pay $36,671.50 in reasonable attorney fees and $4,298.15 in costs and expenses to Plaintiff. (See Code Civ. Proc., §1033.5, subd. (a)(10)(B) [statutory attorney fees]; Civ. Code §1794, subd. (d) [Song-Beverly attorney fees]; PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler (2000) 22 Cal.4th 1084, 1095-1096 [lodestar; trial court’s discretion]; Reynolds v. Ford Motor Company (2020) 47 Cal.App.5th 1105, 1112 [same]; Wood Decl. ¶¶ 7-11 [description of services performed]; 12-20 [justification for hourly rates sought], 22- 23 [timekeeping procedures]; and Ex. 6 [timekeeping records].)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share