DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO2100239·marin·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing 3 months agoGRANTED

IN RE THE MATTHEW JONES SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST

Third Account and Report of Trustee and Petition for Its Approval and for Approval of Attorney Fees

Hearing date
May 21, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJason Jones

Attorneys

Jason Jonesfor Petitioner

Ruling

PRO2100239 IN RE THE MATTHEW JONES SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST

Third Account and Report of Trustee and Petition for Its Approval and for Approval of Attorney Fees, filed by Jason Jones on 4/16/26.

Ruling. Absent objections, the Third Account and Report of Trustee will be granted without hearing. Trustee is ordered to comply with the following future dates:

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 8 | 15

1. Trustee’s Fourth Account and Report for the period 2/3/26 – 2/2/28 shall be filed by April 13, 2028.

2. A status hearing re filing the Second Account and Report shall be set on May 18, 2028, at 10:00 a.m. a. If the Second Account and Report is not timely filed, an appearance will be required. b. If the Second Account and Report is timely filed, the hearing will be set on May 18, 2028, at 9:00 a.m.

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 9 | 15

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share