| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File First Amended Complaint To Include Punitive Damages
Matter on calendar for Thursday, May 21, 2026, Line 4, PLAINTIFF HOWARD HONG's MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File First Amended Complaint To Include Punitive Damages.
Plaintiff Howard Hong's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint is granted. Hong shall file the FAC attached as Exhibit 1 to the Koppelman Declaration within one week.
Leave for a party to amend a pleading should be granted "in furtherance of justice." (Code Civ. Proc., section 473, subd. (a)(1).) "That trial courts are to liberally permit such amendments, at any stage of the proceeding, has been established policy in this state since 1901." (Hirsa v. Superior Court (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 486, 488-89.) Leave to amend is properly denied when the proposed amendment fails to state a valid cause of action and thus would be futile, or where the plaintiff has delayed in seeking the amendment and the delay has prejudiced the defendant. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739.)
The court does not find futility. Defendants dispute the facts Hong relies on, but this is not a basis to refuse amendment. The amendment is plausible on its face.
With regard to undue delay and prejudice, the court would have to find that both are present to deny amendment. Even assuming Hong unduly delayed deposing the witnesses whose testimony led to his request to amend, defendants show no prejudice. The amendments do not change the tenor of the case, and there is ample time before trial for defendants to make pleadings motions or dispositive motions.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA). | |