Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief From Clerical Error Pursuant To Ccp Section 473(A)(1)
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676974 - June 13, 2025 Hearing date: June 13, 2025 Case number: CUD24676974 Case title: DAVID LATULIPPE ET AL VS. ADAM KARL HEINZ MAX Case Number: | | CUD24676974 | Case Title: | | DAVID LATULIPPE ET AL VS. ADAM KARL HEINZ MAX | Court Date: | | 2025-06-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Relief From Clerical Error Pursuant To Ccp Section 473(A)(1) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for June 13, 2025 line 12.
PLAINTIFF DAVID LATULIPPE, AN INDIVIDUAL, RONALD SEELY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM CLERICAL ERROR PURSUANT TO CCP SECTION 473(A)(1) is GRANTED. No opposition on file. Plaintiff to file an amended Complaint that attaches the Five-Day Notice in Exhibit A forthwith. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”