Motion To Vacate Renewal Of Judgment
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD07624076 - July 24, 2025 Hearing date: July 24, 2025 Case number: CUD07624076 Case title: JACKSON HOU VS. BENHAM ZANDINEJAD et al Case Number: | | CUD07624076 | Case Title: | | JACKSON HOU VS. BENHAM ZANDINEJAD et al | Court Date: | | 2025-07-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Vacate Renewal Of Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 24, 2025, line 3.
Defendant's Motion to Vacate Renewal of Judgment is DENIED. Renewal judgment was properly served to defendant's address of record in 2018. Defendant has never updated defendant's address of record in this action. Therefore, this is the address where papers are required to be served. Since service of the renewal judgment in 2018 was proper, the renewal judgment is not void, and this motion is untimely under CCP 683.170. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”