Amended Notice Of Continued Hearing On Motion To Dismiss Complaint Or Stay This Action On Grounds Of Forum Non Conveniens, Or Alternatively, Demurrer To Complaint
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622060 - July 21, 2025 Hearing date: July 21, 2025 Case number: CGC25622060 Case title: MICHAEL ROSENFELD ET AL VS. DEUTSCHE BANK AG Case Number: | | CGC25622060 | Case Title: | | MICHAEL ROSENFELD ET AL VS. DEUTSCHE BANK AG | Court Date: | | 2025-07-21 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended Notice Of Continued Hearing On Motion To Dismiss Complaint Or Stay This Action On Grounds Of Forum Non Conveniens, Or Alternatively, Demurrer To Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for July 21, 2025, line 5.
Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint or Stay this Action on Grounds of Forum Non Conveniens is GRANTED, in part. Rosenfeld, et al v. Deutsche Bank AG, Case No. CGC-25-622060, is stayed during the pendency of Deutsche Bank AG, New York Branch v. Rosenfeld, Index No. 659459/2024, filed in the state of New York. The Court finds that there will be two parallel actions arising out of the same loan and related guaranties between substantially the same parties, which will needlessly increase the burden and expense on the courts and litigants, and which could lead to conflicting judgments. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tent ative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”