M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST VS. JOSEPH THEISEN ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice Of Hearing And Motion To Quash Or Alternatively For Protective Order Re Callaway Deposition
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Quash · Other
Parties
- Plaintiff: M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST
- Defendant: JOSEPH THEISEN
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 17, 2025, Line 8. PLAINTIFF M. DATTANI CREDIT TRUST's Motion To Quash Or Alternatively For Protective Order Re Callaway Deposition.
Plaintiff's motion to quash and for a protective order is granted. Generally, a bankruptcy stay precludes discovery from the debtor. (Scherer v. Carroll (D VT 1993) 150 B.R. 549, 552; In re Manown (BC ND GA 1997) 213 B.R. 411, 412 ["the automatic stay is designed to protect Debtor from the burden of responding to discovery and defending a court action"].) In In re Miller (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2001) 262 B.R. 499, 504, the court allowed discovery to proceed against the debtor where the "discovery requests are framed as discovery pertaining only to the claims against the other non-debtor defendants."
Here, given the overlap between this case and plaintiff's action against Mr. Callaway (CGC-22-603028), the court does not see how the parties will realistically be able to question Mr. Callaway regarding matters distinct to Defendants without also implicating liability issues against Mr. Callaway. In addition, Defendant's suggestion of a "one-sided" deposition without cross-examination from plaintiff is unfair, prejudicial, and wasteful. On this record, Plaintiff's alleged prejudice from delaying Calloway's deposition is outweighed by the factors weighing against the deposition at this time. Given these circumstances, the motion is granted.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |