EDUARDO D. CERNA ET AL VS. GENERAL MOTORS LLC ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Motion Type Tags
Motion for Summary Judgment · Motion for Summary Adjudication
Parties
- Plaintiff: EDUARDO D. CERNA
- Defendant: GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Ruling
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Wednesday, July 23, 2025, Line 4 [Part 2 of 2 of the tentative ruling]. DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION.
Plaintiffs purchased a used vehicle and are attempting to recover for that purchase under the Song-Beverly Act. (Complaint, pars. 8, 20, 35.) There is no contention that defendant issued a warranty at the time of purchase and therefore, under Rodriguez, plaintiffs' alleged claims are no longer viable. Even though plaintiffs are the original owners of the vehicle and have remained in sole possession, the lease and sale transactions were distinct.
Newly enacted CCP 871.20 et seq. does not change the analysis. Those provisions do not alter the definition of "new motor vehicle" under the Song-Beverly Act. In addition, that statutory scheme became effective in 2025 and does not apply to this action. Nevertheless, plaintiffs did lease a new vehicle and are entitled to the protections of the Song-Beverly Act for that lease period. Based on the above, plaintiffs have leave to plead a Song-Beverly Act claim based on the new vehicle warranty plaintiffs allegedly obtained when they leased the vehicle and they may seek to recover pre-purchase damages.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. [End of part 2 of 2 of the tentative ruling]. =(301/CVA) | |