PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: MAY 20, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 23CV00563
EVANS v. BEAR CREEK CANYON ROAD ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
(UNOPPOSED) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
The unopposed motion is continued to June 5, 2026, so that plaintiff may comply with Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1324, by including a copy of the proposed amended complaint.
No. 22CV01358
JP EQUIPMENT RENTALS v. CAL. EARTHMOVERS
MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL (UNOPPOSED)
The motion is granted but Mr. Tunink is ordered to resubmit a proposed order on form MC-053 that includes the upcoming case management conference date of June 1, 2026, and to serve defendant 221 Airport Blvd. LLC with notice of the June 1, 2026 case management conference. Defendant or its new counsel are directed to appear at the June 1, 2026, case management conference.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”