DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV090260·alameda·Civil·Partition Action
Hearing todayGRANTED

HARDMAN, et al. vs HARDMAN

Motion to Confirm Sale

Hearing date
Sep 10, 2026
Department
22
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffHARDMAN
PlaintiffKEN HARDMAN
PlaintiffGARY HARDMAN
PlaintiffVERENA HARDMAN
PlaintiffKVH Family Trust
DefendantHARDMAN

Ruling

24CV090260: HARDMAN, et al. vs HARDMAN 09/10/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other Motion to Confirm Sale; filed by KEN HARDMAN (Plaintiff) + CRS# 913366175625 in Department 22

Tentative Ruling - 09/09/2026 Han N. Tran

The Motion re: 20260901 Hardman_ Notice ISO Motion to Confirm Sale - Executed filed by GARY HARDMAN, VERENA HARDMAN, as trustee of thE KVH Family Trust, KEN HARDMAN on 09/02/2026 is Granted.

The unopposed/joint motion to confirm sale is GRANTED. The moving papers and partition referee's report comply with necessary procedures. The court will sign the parties' proposed order.

HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING? THROUGH eCOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed” BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK (dept22@alameda.courts.ca.gov) and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing.

This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely. Notice via BOTH eCourt AND email is required. The tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if no party contests the tentative ruling.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share