| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion to Compel Defendant, Haystack Pizza, Inc., to Respond to Special Interrogatories; Motion for Monetary Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25622392 - September 17, 2025 Hearing date: September 17, 2025 Case number: CGC25622392 Case title: JOSE IRIARTE VS. HAYSTACK PIZZA, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622392 | Case Title: | | JOSE IRIARTE VS. HAYSTACK PIZZA, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-17 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant, Haystack Pizza,,Inc., To Respond To Special Interrogatori Es, For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant, Haystack Pizza,, Inc9 In The Amount Of $2,850.00 Filed On Behalf Of Plaintiff, Jose Iriarte | Rulings: | | Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, September 17, 2025, Line 11.
PLAINTIFF JOSE IRIARTE's Motion To Compel Defendant, Haystack Pizza,,Inc., To Respond To Special Interrogatori Es, For Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant, Haystack Pizza,, Inc9 In The Amount Of $2,850.00 Filed On Behalf Of Plaintiff, Jose Iriarte.
Plaintiff Jose Iriarte's unopposed Motion to Compel Defendant, Haystack Pizza, Inc., to Respond to Special Interrogatories [sic], for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED.
The discovery requests at issue-form interrogatories-employment-appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.) Defendant Haystack Pizza, Inc. has not established that it has provided any responses to the form interrogatories. No meet and confer requirement exists for motions to compel responses for Form Interrogatories when no responses have been provided. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290.)
Defendant Haystack Pizza, Inc. shall serve verified, objection-free, substantive responses to Plaintiff Jose Iriarte's Form Interrogatories-Employment, Set One by October 2, 2025. Defendant Haystack Pizza, Inc. did not act with substantial justification in connection with this discovery. Defendant Haystack Pizza, Inc. shall pay $1160 to Plaintiff Jose Iriarte. as sanctions, payment no later than October 9, 2025. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030 and 2030.290.)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |