NEVILLE WRIGHT VS. TURK STREET INVESTORS LLC ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One; Request for Monetary Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Further Responses · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: NEVILLE WRIGHT
- Defendant: TURK STREET INVESTORS LLC
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, August 28, 2025, Line 7. 2 - DEFENDANT TURK STREET INVESTORS LLC.'s Motion Of Defendant Turk Stree Investors, Llc To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Set One, And Request For Monetary Sanctions
Defendant Turk Street Investors, LLC's motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories, set one, is granted. The form interrogatories at issue are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.)
Defendant demonstrated the responses were incomplete. Plaintiff did not demonstrate the merit of any objection. Defendant demonstrates that it attempted to meet and confer in good faith and plaintiff's responses were deficient.
Plaintiff provided otherwise sufficient but unverified responses to Interrogatory Nos.: 1.1, 2.5, 2.11, 2.12, 2.13, 4.2, 10.2, 11.1, 50.3, 50.4. (See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636 [unverified response tantamount to no responses at all].)
Plaintiff provided deficient unverified responses to Interrogatory Nos.: 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.3, 12.3, 12.4, 12.6, 14.1, 14.2, 50.2.
Plaintiff provided a verified response that was deficient for Interrogatory Nos.: 4.1, 6.1, 8.1 (numbered "8.0" in plaintiff's responses), 12.1, 13.1.
Plaintiff provided no response at all for Interrogatory Nos: 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 11.2, 12.2, 12.5, 12.7, 13.2, 17.1, 50.1, 50.5, and 50.6.
Plaintiff shall provide verified responsive answers to the cited form interrogatories by September 19, 2025. The record does not show Plaintiff acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery and motion. Plaintiff shall pay Defendant $1,060 as sanctions by September 30, 2025.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.)
To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address.
=(302/JMQ) | |