DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2600332·riverside·Civil·Prejudgment Possession
Hearing 10 days agoGRANTED

CITY OF RIVERSIDE vs ROSALIE J. PLUIM

MOTION FOR ORDER OF PREJUDGMENT POSSESSION

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
2
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITY OF RIVERSIDE
DefendantROSALIE J. PLUIM

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF DOCUMENTS FROM CVRI2503807 EDISON COMPANY, vs DEFENDANT ANNE M. BLACKBURN BLACKBURN AND MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:

Hearing continued to September 10, 2026.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF DOCUMENTS FROM CVRI2503807 EDISON COMPANY, vs DEFENDANT MARK S. BLACKBURN BLACKBURN AND MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:

Hearing continued to September 10, 2026.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT CVRI2505443 DUHU vs BROWN ON CROSS-COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:

Stipulation to Set Aside Entry of Default and the Filing of a First Amended Cross- Complaint; Order on Cross-Complaint of BROOKE BROWN was filed July 21, 2026.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITY OF RIVERSIDE vs MOTION FOR ORDER OF

ROSALIE J. PLUIM PREJUDGMENT POSSESSION Tentative Ruling:

No opposition filed. Motion granted. The Court grants request for Judicial Notice. Prevailing party to prepare the Order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share