ALLAN MERCER VS. SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Motion Type Tags
Motion for Summary Judgment
Parties
- Plaintiff: Allan Mercer
- Defendant: San Francisco Airport Commission
- Defendant: Hertz Global Holdings, Inc.
Attorneys
- Brian A. Morris — for Defendant
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, August 21, 2025, Line 3 1 - DEFENDANT HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC.'s MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
Defendant Hertz Global Holdings LLC, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment is denied.
Hertz's motion is premised entirely on the single purported undisputed material fact that the naming of Hertz as a Doe defendant is untenable as a matter of law because plaintiff Allan Mercer admitted at his deposition that he was "aware of Hertz's identity as a potential defendant from the time of the underlying accident." Hertz cites six brief portions of Mr. Mercer's deposition as the evidentiary support for this purported fact. All six portions of Mr. Mercer's deposition are quoted on pages 1 and 2 of Hertz's initial memorandum on this motion. Read singly or collectively, those portions of Mr. Mercer's deposition do not establish that Mr. Mercer knew at the time of his accident that Hertz was responsible for the paint design and curb maintenance where Mr. Mercer tripped.
Accordingly, Hertz has not satisfied its summary motion burden showing that Mr. Mercer's claims against Hertz are time-barred due to Mr. Mercer's invalid use of the Doe Amendment procedure and thus Hertz's motion must be denied.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |