ROSALIND ARBEL VS. DOMINIC D YIN ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Deemed Admissions And For Sanctions Against Trader Joe'S
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Discovery · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: Rosalind Arbel
- Plaintiff: Nir Arbel
- Defendant: Dominic D Yin
- Defendant: Trader Joe's Company
Attorneys
- Oliver Vallejo — for Plaintiff
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC23604116 - September 11, 2025 Hearing date: September 11, 2025 Case number: CGC23604116 Case title: ROSALIND ARBEL VS. DOMINIC D YIN ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23604116 | Case Title: | | ROSALIND ARBEL VS. DOMINIC D YIN ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-11 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Deemed Admissions And For Sanctions Against Trader Joe'S; Memorandum In Support; Declaration Of Oliver Vallejo | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for September 11, 2025, line 3. PLAINTIFFS ROSALIND ARBEL, NIR ARBEL'S Motion For Deemed Admissions And For Sanctions Against Trader Joe's.
Plaintiffs Rosalind Arbel and Nir Arbel's unopposed Motion for Deemed Admissions and Sanctions is GRANTED. Under CCP 2033.280(c), the court shall deem unanswered requests for admissions (RFAs) admitted, unless it finds the responding party, before hearing on the motion, served a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with CCP 2033.220. The record here demonstrates Plaintiff sent requests for admissions that appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.)
Defendant Trader Joe's Company failed to answer/respond. The record does not demonstrate its failure was reasonable or justified. The requests set out in Plaintiffs' Request for Admissions, Set Three, dated June 181, 2025, are deemed admitted. The record does not show Defendant acted with substantial justification in connection with these RFAs. Defendant Trader Joe's Company shall pay $650 to Plaintiffs in sanctions by September 30, 2025.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |