| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO STRIKE Amended COMPLAINT
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Thursday, August 21, 2025, Line 5. DEFENDANT CHANGSENG XU's MOTION TO STRIKE 1ST Amended COMPLAINT.
Defendant Changseng Xu's motion to strike punitive damages allegations from plaintiff Tarryn Cooper's First Amended Complaint is denied.
Civil Code, section 3294, subdivision (a), permits a plaintiff in a personal injury action to recover punitive damages "where it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice." Subdivision (c) states, "(1) 'Malice' means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. (2) 'Oppression' means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights."
Cooper pleads that Xu negligently crashed his car into another car that slowed suddenly, rear ending the other car "with great force." (FAC para. 10.) The car that Xu hit spun around and "slam[med] into the driver's side" of Cooper's vehicle. (Id.) Xu knew that Cooper was injured in the accident, but he ran away rather than render aid. (Id. para. 11.)
Accepting these facts as true and giving the operative complaint a liberal construction, the court concludes that Cooper has sufficiently pled that Xu acted with willful and conscious disregard of her safety, and a reasonable jury could conclude the conduct was despicable, meeting the statutory definition of malice. The punitive damages claim is therefore adequately pled.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |