PLAINTIFF ZIJING WANG'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC24619393 - September 2, 2025 Hearing date: September 2, 2025 Case number: CGC24619393 Case title: ZIJING WANG VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24619393 | Case Title: | | ZIJING WANG VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-02 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | PLAINTIFF ZIJING WANG'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE [ADDED FOR POSTING OF PART 2 OF 2 OF THE TENTATIVE RULING.] | Rulings: | | Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Tuesday, September 2, 2025, Line 4 [Part 2 of 2 of the tentative ruling].
PLAINTIFF ZIJING WANG'S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE.
Code of Civil Procedure, section 2031.310, subdivision (h) states, "the court shall impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 2023.010) against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel further response to a demand, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust."
Neither party seeks sanctions here, but discovery sanctions serve the salutary purpose of encouraging informal resolution of discovery disputes. They therefore conserve the court's and the parties' resources. As the statute says, the court "shall" impose a sanction unless the unsuccessful party demonstrates substantial justification. The court does not find substantial justification here. The court therefore orders Wang to pay $500 in sanctions to the court within 30 days of entry of this order.
A party is entitled to notice before being subject to sanctions. If Wang contests this portion of the tentative, the court will issue an order to show cause and set the sanctions issue for hearing on a future date to give Wang the opportunity to respond to the OSC.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address.
[End of part 2 of 2 of the tentative ruling.] =(301/CVA) | |