DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26FL0565·eldorado·Civil·Dissolution of Marriage
Hearing todayParties ordered to appear

Amanda Hutchens v. Kyle Hutchens

Request for Order (RFO) seeking child support, spousal support, property control, and attorney’s fees

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,400$5,000

Parties

PetitionerAmanda Hutchens
RespondentKyle Hutchens

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 3, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

3. AMANDA HUTCHENS V. KYLE HUTCHENS 26FL0565

On June 16, 2026, Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) seeking child support, spousal support, property control, and attorney’s fees. She filed her Income and Expense Declaration concurrently therewith. All required documents were served on July 17th.

Respondent filed his Responsive Declaration to Request for Order and his Income and Expense Declaration on August 14th. There is no Proof of Service for either document therefore the court cannot consider them.

Petitioner is requesting guideline child support for each of the four children. She further requests spousal support in the amount of $1,400. She also asks for temporary exclusive use, possession, and control of the property located at 1310 Canvasback Circle. Finally, she is requesting attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,000.

The parties are ordered to appear for the hearing. Respondent is ordered to bring with him a completed Income and Expense Declaration with supporting documents. Both parties are ordered to bring their proposed Xspouse reports.

TENTATIVE RULING #3: THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR FOR THE HEARING. RESPONDENT IS ORDERED TO BRING WITH HIM A COMPLETED INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. BOTH PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO BRING THEIR PROPOSED XSPOUSE REPORTS.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share