SCOTT ALLEN GRINDY ET AL VS. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion To Compel Plaintiffs' Discovery Responses And For Monetary Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Discovery · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: Scott Grindy
- Plaintiff: Anne Grindy
- Defendant: San Mateo County Harbor District
Attorneys
- Gregory C. Cattermole — for Plaintiff
Ruling
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Thursday, August 21, 2025, Line 2. 1 - DEFENDANT SAN MATEO COUNTY HARBOR DISTRICT's Motion To Compel Plaintiffs' Discovery Responses And For Monetary Sanctions.
Defendant San Mateo County Harbor District's unopposed motion to compel responses to its first set of form interrogatories, first set of special interrogatories, and first set of requests for production of documents, propounded to plaintiffs Scott Grindy and Anne Grindy, is granted. The court further grants the Harbor District's motion for sanctions.
The Harbor District propounded this discovery separately to each plaintiff on October 1, 2024. (Nozzolino Dec. paras. 2 & 3 & Exs. A and B.) Neither plaintiff has responded. (Id. paras. 9-13.) By failing to timely respond, Plaintiffs Scott Grindy and Anne Grindy have waived their objections to the discovery requests. (CCP 2030.290(a), 2031.300(a).)
Each plaintiff is ordered to serve verified responses, without objections, accompanied by responsive documents, within two weeks of notice of entry of this order. If the responsive documents are voluminous plaintiffs may make a rolling production but shall complete production within 30 days.
The Harbor District seeks sanctions. The court concludes that the failure to submit to an authorized method of discovery is a misuse of the discovery process and orders Plaintiffs' counsel Gregory C. Cattermole to pay $1325 to the Harbor District within 30 days of notice of entry of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |