WILLIAM THOMAS SR VS. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL

SF Superior Court - Asbestos Law & Motion - CGC24277246 - September 9, 2025 Hearing date: September 9, 2025 Case number: CGC24277246 Case title: WILLIAM THOMAS SR VS. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24277246 | Case Title: | | WILLIAM THOMAS SR VS. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-09-09 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Granting Preference In Setting Case For Trial, And Extending Discovery Cutoff | Rulings: | | On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, September 9, 2025, Department 304, Line 3. PLAINTIFF'S LAWRENCE JANSEN, MICHELE JANSEN'S Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Granting Leave To File First Amended Complaint (Part 1 of 2), Plaintiff's Motion for Order Granting Preference in Setting Case for Trial, and Extending Discovery Cutoff is GRANTED under C.C.P. Section 36(a).

Opposition filed by Defendant Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA. Reply filed.

Plaintiff has established the threshold requirements for preferential trial setting under Code Civ. Proc. Section 36(a). Plaintiff's daughter declaration and his counsels are ample to meet the statutory standard. Moreover, Defendant's due process argument is meritless. "Where a party meets the requisite standard for calendar preference under [Code of Civil Procedure section 36] subdivision (a), preference must be granted. No weighing of interests is involved." (Fox v. Superior Court (2018) 21 Cal.App.5th 529, 535; see also, e.g., Miller v.

Superior Court (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 1200, 1204 [statute "grants a mandatory and absolute right to trial preference"]; Swaithes v. Superior Court (1989) 212 Cal.App.3d 1082, 1085 [trial court "has no power to balance the different interests of opposing litigants in applying the provision"]; Koch-Ash v. Superior Court (1986) 180 Cal.App.3d 689, 694 [section 36(a) "must be deemed to be mandatory and absolute" and "no discretion is left to trial courts."].)

1. The trial date is December 29, 2025, at 11:15 a.m. in Department 206. a. Last day pursuant to C.C.P. section 36(f) is January 7, 2025. b. The parties shall follow the California Rules of Court, San Francisco Local Rules, and Local Rule 20.

2. The last day for hearing summary judgment/adjudication motions is December 23, 2025. a. Summary judgment/adjudication motions shall be brought on regular notice pursuant to the relevant provisions of the C.C.P., unless the parties stipulate otherwise. b. Before a party files and serves a summary judgment/adjudication motion, it must contact the clerk to make a reservation. c. The Court allows a maximum of four summary judgment/adjudication motions per day to be calendared, unless good cause is found to exceed this number. Contact the clerk to schedule a good cause hearing.

3. Time to respond to written discovery not yet served is shortened to 20 days. a. For written discovery that has already been served, responses are due within 20 days of this hearing or by the date determined by the C.C.P., whichever is earlier. b. Any issue/dispute that requires meet and confer, shall occur in person or via telephone, not by email or letter.

4. Electronic service is considered the equivalent of personal service.

5. The fact discovery cut-off date is December 12, 2025.

6. The expert discovery cut-off date is December 26, 2025.

7. All bankruptcy documents shall be turned over to defendants no later than October 9, 2025. a. If Plaintiff submits documents to bankruptcy trusts after this date, they must notify Defendants no later than five days after submission. b. The fact discovery cut-off does not apply to bankruptcy documents.

8. No later than September 23, 2025: a. Plaintiff must provide a statement to each Defendant stating the name and contact information of each lay person with knowledge of any facts supporting Plaintiff's claims as to each Defendant.

b. Defendants must provide a statement stating the name and contact information of each lay person with knowledge of facts supporting Defendant's affirmative defenses. c. Any person not identified on the statements may be barred from testifying at trial or presenting a declaration on a summary judgment motion. (Tentative ruling continues in Part 2 of 2) | |