| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
STATUS HEARING RE: SUBDIVISION (F)
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622665 - October 22, 2025 Hearing date: October 22, 2025 Case number: CGC25622665 Case title: JEANNE HAM PETO VS. THOMAS P. FAZEKAS ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622665 | Case Title: | | JEANNE HAM PETO VS. THOMAS P. FAZEKAS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-22 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | STATUS HEARING RE: SUBDIVISION (F) {PER AUG-18-2025 HEARING) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 22, 2025. Line 4. STATUS HEARING RE: SUBDIVISION (F) {PER AUG-18-2025 HEARING) Hearing Required.
No later than 9:00 a.m. on October 22, 2025 Ms. Saling to file a declaration limited to the following: (1) explaining why appraisal was not filed on September 12, 2025 and why leave of Court was not requested for late filing; and (2) point to the page number in the.pdf document filed on September 22, 2025 containing verification or sworn statement.
Ms. Saling and Mr. Ricci to be present in-person or via Zoom with video capability. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”