| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Allow The Substitution Of Successor In Interest And The Continuation Of The Action
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC23606794 - October 9, 2025 Hearing date: October 9, 2025 Case number: CGC23606794 Case title: DANILO QUIAZON VS. RICO QUIAZON ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23606794 | Case Title: | | DANILO QUIAZON VS. RICO QUIAZON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-09 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Allow The Substitution Of Successor In Interest And The Continuation Of The Action | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 9, 2025, line 3.
Myrna Mayunga's Motion to Allow the Substitution of Successor in Interest and the Continuation of the Action. Hearing Required to address compliance with CCP 128.7(b). Compare Memorandum of Points and Authorities signed on August 29, 2025 by Michael Freedman 2:12 and Petition for Probate for Authorization to Administer Under the Independent Administration of Estates Act signed by Michale Freedman on August 3, 2025. Michael Freedman to be present in-person. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”