| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production, Set One, And Form Interrogatories, Set One; And Request For Sanctions
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CGC25622622 - October 21, 2025 Hearing date: October 21, 2025 Case number: CGC25622622 Case title: MICHELLE GUIRAL VS. LYFT, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622622 | Case Title: | | MICHELLE GUIRAL VS. LYFT, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-21 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production, Set One, And Form Interrogatories, Set One; And Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for October 21, 2025, line 9. PLAINTIFF MICHELLE GUIRAL'S Motion To Compel Further Responses To Plaintiffs Request For Production, Set One, And Form Interrogatories, Set One; And Request For Sanctions.
Plaintiff's motion to compel further responses to request for production (set one) and form interrogatories (set one) is GRANTED. The propounded discovery is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (CCP 2017.010.)
Defendant's objections based on relevance and overbreadth lack merit. Its objection based on the possibility of filing a motion to compel arbitration also lacks merit. Under CCP 1281.4, the action is stayed "upon motion" of a party seeking arbitration. Here, defendant served the objections relying on CCP 1281.4 even though no motion to compel arbitration was pending. Defendant's position lacks substantial justification. If defendant wanted to take advantage of the stay provision of CCP 1281.4, then it should have filed its motion to compel arbitration prior to the discovery response due date. Defendant shall provide objection-free verified responses to the discovery by November 14, 2025. Plaintiff is entitled to recover $2,100 as reasonable sanctions.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/SKF) | |