Notice Of Motion And Motion To Proceed Anonymously As "Jane Doe"
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25628885 - October 30, 2025 Hearing date: October 30, 2025 Case number: CGC25628885 Case title: JANE DOE VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25628885 | Case Title: | | JANE DOE VS. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-30 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Proceed Anonymously As "Jane Doe" | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for October 30, 2025, line 9. PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S Motion To Proceed Anonymously As “Jane Doe”.
The unopposed motion by plaintiff to proceed anonymously as "Jane Doe" is granted. "Before a party to a civil action can be permitted to use a pseudonym, the trial court must conduct a hearing and apply the overriding interest test: A party's request for anonymity should be granted only if the court finds that an overriding interest will likely be prejudiced without use of a pseudonym, and that it is not feasible to protect the interest with less impact on the constitutional right of access. In deciding the issue the court must bear in mind the critical importance of the public's right to access judicial proceedings.
Outside of cases where anonymity is expressly permitted by statute, litigating by pseudonym should occur only in the rarest of circumstances." (Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (2022) 82 Cal.App.5th 105, 111-112 [simplified].)
Here, the court concludes that Jane Doe has a strong interest in protecting her privacy as an alleged victim of sexual assault, and that this interest overrides the public right of access to the narrow fact of her true identity.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |