Giahi vs. Xpress Med Pharmacy, Inc.
Motion for Final Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement; Order to Show Cause
Motion type
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Plaintiffs are ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant.
2 30-2021-01210888 The tentative ruling is to continue the Final Report Hearing to Sanchez vs. DTB December 21, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. to confirm that the amount of the Investments, Inc. uncashed checks after the check-cashing deadline has been delivered to the State Controller’s Office Unclaimed Property Fund in the names of the applicable payees, that the Administrator’s work is complete, and that the court’s file thus may be closed. All supporting papers must be filed at least 16 days before the Final Report Hearing date.
The court also issues an Order to Show Cause why the court should not impose monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel for failing to comply with the court’s order of September 8, 2025 to file all supporting papers for the Final Report Hearing at least 16 days before the Final Report Hearing date. The hearing is set for December 21, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Any response to the OSC must be filed at least a week before the hearing.
The clerk will give notice of this ruling.
3 30-2023-01313532 The tentative ruling is to continue the hearing on Plaintiff Omid Giahi vs. Xpress Giahi’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Med Pharmacy, Inc. and PAGA Settlement to November 23, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel must file supplemental papers addressing the court’s concerns (not fully revised papers that would have to be re-read) at least 16 days before the next hearing date.
In Plaintiff’s April 13, 2026 supplemental brief, Plaintiff stated that a supplemental declaration would be provided by Plaintiff’s counsel Jonathan LaCour, and a supplemental declaration by the settlement administrator’s representative, Chantal Soto-Najera. However, neither declaration was filed with the court. Accordingly: • There is still no documentation of the litigation costs to support the $5,684.17 costs request. • There is also no evidence of the high, low and average payments to be paid to aggrieved employees. • There is also no evidence of the names of the two putative class members who opted out and thus will not be bound by the judgment.
The court also issues an Order to Show Cause why the court should not impose monetary sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel for failing to comply with the court’s order of April 27, 2026 to file supplemental papers addressing the court’s concerns at least 16 days before the August 31, 2026 hearing. The hearing is set for November 23, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. Any response to the OSC must be filed at least a week before the hearing.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of the ruling to the LWDA and Defendants.
4 30-2023-01351412 The court has reviewed and considered the papers filed in support Salas vs. All of plaintiff’s motion for final approval of the $1,650,000.00 class American Racers, action and PAGA settlement. The motion is GRANTED IN Inc. PART as follows:
$6,500.00 enhancement award to plaintiff Steve Salas;
$495,000.00 for attorneys’ fees;
$17,875.95 for litigation costs;
$7,650.00 for settlement administration costs; and
$165,000.00 total PAGA penalties ($123,750.00 to the LWDA).
The final accounting hearing is scheduled July 13, 2027 at 1:30 p.m. in Department CX103. Plaintiff shall submit a final accounting report at least 16 calendar days before the final accounting hearing regarding the status of the settlement administration. The final report must include all information necessary for the court to determine the total amount actually paid to class members and aggrieved employees and any amounts tendered to the State Controller’s Office under the unclaimed property law. If all funds are not fully and finally disbursed prior to the filing deadline, including to the State Controller, plaintiff must request a continuance.
Plaintiff is ordered to give notice, including to the LWDA, and to file a proof of service.
3
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”