DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-0210657·shasta·Civil·Clerical Error / Civil
Hearing in 2 daysCONTINUED

Bleakley v. Airbnb, Inc, et al.

Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc to Set Filing Date

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 28, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMichelle Bleakly
DefendantAirbnb, Inc

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0210657 Tentative Ruling on Motion for Order Nunc Pro Tunc to Set Filing Date: Plaintiff Michelle Bleakly moves for an Order nunc pro tunc setting (or amending) the filing date for the Complaint in this action as May 11, 2026 to correct a clerical error. The Court is inclined to grant the Motion on the merits, if the representations Counsel makes in the Motion are adequately supported by evidence. The Declaration of Sako Demirjian, filed concurrently with the Motion, does not establish any of the facts alleged in the Motion.

Moreover, Exhibits A and B are missing from the filing. The Court will continue hearing on this Motion to permit Plaintiff to file a supplemental declaration that adequately supports the Motion. Today’s hearing is continued to Monday, September 28, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 64. Any supplemental declaration must be filed no later than September 22, 2026.

LOZANO VS. CALIFORNIA TOWING & TRANSPORT, ET AL.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share