FATIMA BAROUDI ET AL VS. SF 434 LEAVENWORTH STREET ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion To Compel Deposition Of Lisa Kelley
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Discovery
Parties
- Plaintiff: Fatima Baroudi
- Plaintiff: Mei Liu
- Defendant: SF 434 Leavenworth Street
- Defendant: Veritas Investments, Inc.
Ruling
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery Calendar for Thursday, October 16, 2025, Line 5. 1- PLAINTIFF MEI LIU's Motion To Compel Deposition Of Lisa Kelley.
Plaintiff Mei Liu's motion to compel deposition of Lisa Kelly and for monetary sanctions is granted as to the motion to compel and denied as to monetary sanctions. Defendant Veritas Investments, Inc. must make Ms. Kelly available for deposition on a mutually agreeable date on or before October 24, 2025. Substantial justice and the objectives of civil discovery support allowing the deposition of Ms, Kelly.
All of the arguments why the motion to compel should be denied are rejected. Though the motion was served with insufficient notice, by opposing the motion on the merits Veritas waived the untimeliness of the motion. "[O]pposition to the motion on its merits is a waiver of any defects or irregularities in the notice of motion," particularly where, as here, the opposing party has not claimed, much less shown, any prejudice. (Carlton v. Quint (2000) 77 Cal. App. 4th 690, 697-698 (quoting an earlier case)).
Nor has Veritas claimed or shown any prejudice from the technical errors of failing to serve the subpoena (which was not required) attached to the first notice of deposition, providing insufficient notice in the amended notice, and stating two different dates in the amended notice. Because Veritas' opposition to the motion to compel did not lack substantial justification, the request for monetary sanctions is denied.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/HEK) | |