RAYMOND VINCENT DIGIACOMO JR. VS. HEALTHRIGHT 360 ET AL

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC22601012 - November 19, 2025 Hearing date: November 19, 2025 Case number: CGC22601012 Case title: RAYMOND VINCENT DIGIACOMO JR. VS. HEALTHRIGHT 360 ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22601012 | Case Title: | | RAYMOND VINCENT DIGIACOMO JR. VS. HEALTHRIGHT 360 ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-19 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Compelling Defendant Denise Williams To Further Respond To Frogs1 And Request For Monetary Sanction; Declaration; And, Memorandum. | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for November 19, 2025, line 3. PLAINTIFF RAYMOND DIGIACOMO'S Motion For Order Compelling Defendant Denise Williams To Further Respond To Frogs1 And Request For Monetary Sanction.

Plaintiff Raymond Vincent DiGiacomo, Jr.'s motion for an ordering requiring defendant Denise Williams to further respond to his form interrogatories, set one, is granted in part and denied in part.

Williams is ordered to make further responses to form interrogatory nos. 2.1(b), 2.1(c), 2.7(a), 2.7(b), 2.7(c), and 2.7(d). These are basic background questions that parties to litigation should expect to respond to; they go to credibility and enable party-opponents to conduct investigation. Williams expresses privacy fears, but none of the information requested appears to the court to be sensitive information. DiGiacomo is ordered to use the amended responses only in connection with this litigation.

Williams has represented she will amend her response to form interrogatory no. 2.8. The court orders her to do so. Williams's response to form interrogatory no. 17.1 is sufficient and no further response is ordered. Williams shall make the further responses ordered herein within 30 days.

The court denies DiGiacomo's request for an order compelling a wet-signature verification for the reasons stated in the court's companion order denying further responses to RFP No.

1.

Both parties seek sanctions. The court concludes that both parties' discovery positions lacked substantial justification and does not award sanctions.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |